Physiological and Psychological Effects of Wearing Facemasks – Trust the science…


Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making.

Read Full Abstract:

Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’

Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.

He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.

His main points included:

  1. There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
  2. Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
  3. Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
  4. Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
  5. Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
  6. Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
  7. The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”

Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a “boring guy” who went “to work for a big drug company … listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers.”

Continuing, he said: “But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.

“Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some ‘top-up’ vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.

“Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.”

Read More:

Sunlight Inactivates Coronavirus 8 Times Faster Than Predicted

A team of scientists is calling for greater research into how sunlight inactivates SARS-CoV-2 after realizing there’s a glaring discrepancy between the most recent theory and experimental results.

UC Santa Barbara mechanical engineer Paolo Luzzatto-Fegiz and colleagues noticed the virus was inactivated as much as eight times faster in experiments than the most recent theoretical model predicted.

“The theory assumes that inactivation works by having UVB hit the RNA of the virus, damaging it,” explained Luzzatto-Fegiz.

But the discrepancy suggests there’s something more going on than that, and figuring out what this is may be helpful for managing the virus.

UV light, or the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, is easily absorbed by certain nucleic acid bases in DNA and RNA, which can cause them to bond in ways that are hard to fix.

But not all UV light is the same. Longer UV waves, called UVA, don’t have quite enough energy to cause problems. It’s the mid-range UVB waves in sunlight that are primarily responsible for killing microbes and putting our own cells at risk of Sun damage.

Short-wave UVC radiation has been shown to be effective against viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, even while it’s still safely enveloped in human fluids.

But this type of UV doesn’t usually come into contact with Earth’s surface, thanks to the ozone layer.

“UVC is great for hospitals,” said co-author and Oregon State University toxicologist Julie McMurry. “But in other environments – for instance, kitchens or subways – UVC would interact with the particulates to produce harmful ozone.”

In July 2020, an experimental study tested the effects of UV light on SARS-CoV-2 in simulated saliva. They recorded the virus was inactivated when exposed to simulated sunlight for between 10-20 minutes.

“Natural sunlight may be effective as a disinfectant for contaminated nonporous materials,” Wood and colleagues concluded in the paper.

Luzzatto-Feigiz and team compared those results with a theory about how sunlight achieved this, which was published just a month later, and saw the math didn’t add up.

This study found the SARS-CoV-2 virus was three times more sensitive to the UV in sunlight than influenza A, with 90 percent of the coronavirus‘s particles being inactivated after just half an hour of exposure to midday sunlight in summer.

By comparison, in winter light infectious particles could remain intact for days.

Environmental calculations made by a separate team of researchers concluded the virus’s RNA molecules are being photochemically damaged directly by light rays.

This is more powerfully achieved by shorter wavelengths of light, like UVC and UVB. As UVC doesn’t reach Earth’s surface, they based their environmental light exposure calculations on the medium-wave UVB part of the UV spectrum.

“The experimentally observed inactivation in simulated saliva is over eight times faster than would have been expected from the theory,” wrote Luzzatto-Feigiz and colleagues.

“So, scientists don’t yet know what’s going on,” Luzzatto-Fegiz said.

The researchers suspect it’s possible that instead of affecting the RNA directly, long-wave UVA may be interacting with molecules in the testing medium (simulated saliva) in a way that hastens the inactivation of the virus.

Something similar is seen in wastewater treatment – where UVA reacts with other substances to create molecules that damage viruses.

If UVA can be harnessed to combat SARS-CoV-2, cheap and energy-efficient wavelength-specific light sources might be useful in augmenting air filtration systems at relatively low risk for human health.

“Our analysis points to the need for additional experiments to separately test the effects of specific light wavelengths and medium composition,” Luzzatto-Fegiz concludes.

With the ability of this virus to remain suspended in the air for extended periods of time, the safest means to avoid it in countries where it’s running rampant is still social distancing and wearing masks where distancing isn’t possible. But it’s nice to know that sunlight may be helping us out during the warmer months.


Chemical cocktail found in face masks

Top German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled deep into human lungs.

Professor Michael Braungart, director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute and co-founder of the world-renowned Cradle to Cradle environmental standard has told Ecotextile News that mask wearers unwittingly run the risk of breathing in carcinogens, allergens and tiny synthetic microfibres by wearing both textile and nonwoven surgical masks for long periods of time.

His recent findings have been backed up by another leading industry textile chemist Dr. Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services Augsburg, Germany in partnership with Modern Testing Services Global, Hong Kong who found elevated concentrations of hazardous fluorocarbons, formaldehyde and other potentially carcinogenic substances on surgical face masks: “I can only say 100 per cent that I have similar concerns to Prof. Braungart.”

Read more:

The Great Purge of Civil Liberties Has Begun

Next week, the inevitable will happen: the EU will adopt the vaccination passport. Basically, the world will enter the second phase of the Covid dictatorship: the great purge.

On Wednesday, March 17, Ursula von der Leyen presented the details of what will probably be called the “Digital Green Certificate”. It is to be approved at the EU summit on March 25-26 in Brussels.

European leaders are wary of the word “passport”. It would mean acknowledging the failure of the EU, whose main feat was once free movement of the people within the EU zone without a passport.

This is why they tried to find a name that was as neutral as possible; the Digital Green Certificate is presented to us as aiming to “facilitate freedom of movement”.

That’s patently false and basically newspeak coming from an unelected bureaucrat (like Fauci)! The DGC regulates freedom of movement, full stop.

As in, no jab, no freedom of movement.

Because too small a part of the European population will have time to get vaccinated until June, when the Passport will enter into force, as an alternative to the vaccine, the test will be – for the time being – accepted.

In reality, it is a false alternative, aiming to create the impression that vaccination is not mandatory.

The vaccine is free of charge and is valid for at least 6 months. A test is valid for 24-48 hours and costs 50-75 euros (almost $100), and a person will probably need two negative/valid tests to be able to travel: one when leaving the country and another when returning.

It is not difficult to guess the option of most who will want to travel.

With the Vaccination Passport, no matter what it is called, we enter the second phase of Operation COVID.

Phase I consisted of crushing the population with draconian restrictions and imposing a police regime, unimaginable a year ago in a world that called itself “Free”.

Rights and freedoms disappeared overnight. Mankind suddenly woke up to a medical dictatorship. In reality, it is a political dictatorship hidden under a white robe.

The white robe is the best disguise for this global cabal. Who dares to get in the way of the noble goal of public health?

Politicians took a step back and allowed Bill Gates and his minions “experts” from WHO to rule the world via dictate/edict.

Exactly one year after we were locked in our houses and forced to wear masks all the time, here comes hope: you can fly, baby, fly, with one condition: get the jab.

You see what they did there? You must get the vaccine not for your health, but for “freedom”. 

Phase II of Operation COVID begins with the conditioning of a fundamental right – freedom of movement – by a medical act.

Read More:

The phrase “trust the science” is one of the most unscientific things you can say.

There is a phrase I’m sure you have heard over and over again the past year. Whether it was regarding mask usage, the importance of lockdowns, or now with the vaccine, the phrase you can’t escape is “trust the science”.

This phrase is spewed constantly in the mainstream media, from so-called experts and all over social media. The purpose of course is to allay people’s fears that these new and unproven theories are in fact, proven. They do this by trying to claim that everything they want you to believe is already settled science, and now you must simply trust the science.

The problem here is that science and the scientific method is not based on trust at all. In fact, trust is the antithesis of the scientific method. The scientific method is based on skepticism, or the suspension of belief.

The scientific method is based on one throwing out all preconceived notions and simply going where the real data leads them.

But sadly, over the past year we have seen experts do the exact opposite. There were no studies to suggest lockdowns work, yet the experts had already made up their mind, so they told us to trust the science. If you disagreed, you were labeled a “science denier”. An insane irony considering the exact opposite has been true. Those pushing for unproven lockdowns were the true science deniers. They invented what they wanted to be true then manipulated the data to support their claims. It was the opposite of the scientific method.

We are seeing this exact same thing with the vaccine roll-out. As I’ve already written about here and what you probably already know is the technology behind these vaccines has never been used before. So the truth is, nobody really knows what to expect and what to watch out for.

But that hasn’t stopped the media and the “experts” to once again call on people to “trust the science”. There have been no long term studies at all on these new mRNA vaccines, so there is no science to even trust. All we have are theories without rigorous testing. But if you watch the mainstream media at all, you would believe that the success of the vaccines is somehow already settled science.

So as you can see, the phrase “trust the science” isn’t about science at all. It’s about selling an idea to people. It’s about appealing to an individual’s desire to be considered intelligent and informed. This is why the phrase is often paired with the insult of “science denier”. If you fail to trust the science, that means you are a science denier.

It’s clever piece of social manipulation no doubt. It appeals perfectly to the need to be seen as intelligent. Once it takes hold, anyone who questions the original idea must be able to withstand the insults of the mob who don’t want their perfect little fairy tale to be disturbed.

Read more:

BREAKING! International Criminal Court accepts complaint of violation of Nuremberg Code by Israeli government

Violation of Nuremberg code by government of Israel and other parties

On March 5, it was announced that the “People of Truth” organization filed a complaint with the Hague Tribunal against the Israeli government for conducting illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through Pfizer.

The organization includes lawyers, doctors, public activists and the general public who have chosen to exercise their democratic right. They do not want to receive experimental medical treatment (Corona vaccine) and they feel that they are under great and serious illegal pressure by (part) of the Israeli government, the media, parliamentarians and ministers, high public representatives, mayors, and others.

Collaboration with Reiner Fuellmich

Last week, lawyers Ruth Makhacholovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski also filed an appeal with the Hague Tribunal for violations of the Nuremberg Code by the Israeli government and others mentioned in the previous paragraph.

Lawyer Ruth Makhchowolski told Israel News on March 5 that “at the same time, the appeal will also be submitted to the Nuremberg Tribunal together with German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich.”

Tactics to promote vaccine readiness

The indictment reads:
“Violation of the Nuremberg Code by the Israeli government and additional (agencies ed.)”

“We address you in the name of “Anshei Emet”, a brotherhood of doctors, physicists, scientists, lawyers, activists and the people who have made the choice to exercise their democratic right not to participate in the experimental medical treatment against COVID19 and who feel under severe pressure, harsh and illegal, by the government, members of the Knesset, ministers, publicly elected representatives, mayors and superiors.”

The complaint also draws comparisons to Nazi criminals who were convicted of such medical experiments.

“This is, in effect, a genetic medical experiment on humanity.”

It also addresses the fact thatalternative normal methods of fighting this flu virus were ignored and ridiculed at all times.

Because of this crime, in Israel only 41% of vaccinated police officers, military personnel, schoolchildren and medical personnel have suffered life-threatening side effects after administering the experimental vaccine, the complaint states.

“It has already been proven that many people died, were paralyzed, injured and disabled by the vaccine,” the complaint states. Yet the Israeli government simply went ahead with the vaccination program.”

The complaint also discusses the bribery scandals:

“People received free hotel stays from various companies, extra vacation days, received benefits from the government and more rights were assigned to vaccinated people (read: rights are taken away from non-vaccinated people).”

Anshei Emet’s claim:

  • To immediately stop the medical experimentation and administration of vaccines to the Israeli public.
  • To ask the government to approve all legislative procedures that do not violate the principle of a person’s informed consent to receive the medical treatment described above, which denies legal status in Israel and in Israeli democracy, including avoiding the creation of a vaccination passport , leaving the names of those who have not been vaccinated with the local authorities or any other relevant legislator.
  • Taking the strictest measures against any public, business or employment entity that violates state labor laws or other matters required to prevent vaccination coercion or offer, as well as discrimination, against those who choose not to receive the above innovative medical care.
  • Please note that a copy of this document will also be forwarded to the media around the world for violation of the Nuremberg Code. Relevant in all countries of the free world.
  • And as a final note, it should be noted that only recently a decision was made in the Council of Europe on 27/1/21, ordering all authorities not to pressure or request people to take the Corona vaccine in any way. Therefore, what is good for advanced European countries is certainly also good for Israel – and the balance speaks for itself “.

It looks like Pfizer and the other prick suppliers are going to have a tough time. The same may well be true for a hefty number of governments.

It is remarkable that ALL MEDIA worldwide knows about it according to the lawyers.

The indictment will certainly also be directed at the media. We assume that the media are aware of this and we are very curious how the media will handle this or if they will report it at all. Tonight’s News Hour?

Here is the link to the complaint filed with the International Criminal Court in The Hague:

A similar complaint will be added to the Nuremberg Tribunal together with German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich.

Complaint accepted by Criminal Court

The wait for the ICC (International Criminal Court) to accept the complaint was short lived.

Yesterday it was announced via Israel News that the complaint was accepted.

Lawyer Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News: Lawyer Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News“The experiment carried out by Pfizer in the State of Israel violates the Nuremberg Code, which belongs to international criminal law and falls under the jurisdiction of the Hague Tribunal. We are now waiting for a decision.”

This is a summary of the global deception being challenged. A January 27 hearing on paper full of distorted truths:


Link to source and FULL COURT DOCUMENT

Lancet Article: 50-75% Of ‘Positive’ PCR Tests Are NOT Infectious People

PCR testing (polymerase chain reaction testing) has come under fire from numerous doctors, scientists, politicians and journalists since the beginning of this pandemic.

Not everyone would know this if their only source of information was mainstream media however, as they’ve chosen not to cover the controversy surrounding it.

This is not to say that PCR testing hasn’t been praised as a useful tool to determine a covid infection, but again, there are great causes for concern that aren’t really being addressed.

As far back as 2007, Gina Kolata published an article in the New York Times about how declaring pandemics based on PCR testing can end in a disaster. The article was titled Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University, an outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic, wrote a piece titled “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?

He has argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could also be as high as 50%.

The Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada, Dr. Barbara Yaffe recently stated that COVID-19 testing may yield at least 50 percent false positives. This means that people who test positive for COVID may not actually have it.

Former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false may actually be as high as 90%.

Furthermore, 22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why, according to them, it’s clear that the PCR test is not effective in identifying COVID-19 cases, and that as a result we may be seeing a significant amount of false positives.

Read More:

AstraZeneca Covid-19 ‘Vaccine’ Disclaimer Insert: ‘This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs)’

Humanity is being genomodified under guise of a deadly cold virus pandemic:

“6. Contents of the pack and other information

What COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains One dose (0.5 ml) contains: Chimpanzee Adenovirus encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein ChAdOx1-S* , not less than 2.5 × 108 infectious units * Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and by recombinant DNA technology. This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).”